|
cookeladoo (May 16, 2008 at 9:41 pm)
I understood your point.No disagreement there. sorry if my comment sounded like I disagree.
PerunsAxe (May 16, 2008 at 5:38 pm)
I put "perfect world" in quotations to show that it is unrealistic. My focus was on a greater civilization, and that is possible through a more advanced type of human.
cookeladoo (May 16, 2008 at 10:15 am)
I very much doubt there will ever be a perfect world no matter how high the average IQ. Monkeys may well be ultra in their own low IQ worlds, sitting in the tree chewing on rotten fruit. While highly intelligent Humans get irritated with each other for not understanding "my" inelegant point of view. Something too perfect may well be boring. Any way like both you and Stodles respective views, it is very thought provoking.
cookeladoo (May 16, 2008 at 10:13 am)
OOOh no, markwatermelon is going to get onto that one "Eurasian Supremacy"
PerunsAxe (May 16, 2008 at 5:41 am)
I commented on that in the white nationalism and eugenics. The pathos of distance which creates great feelings in the soul needs to see an untermenschen to experience this. The first aphorism in Beyond Good and Evil, what is noble
PerunsAxe (May 16, 2008 at 5:38 am)
A "perfect world" seems a bit grandiose. Lets focus upon a greater civilization. That civilization is created by the members of society, and the creativity of those members of society is based upon their genetic capabilities. If this is improved, then the society will be improved, if this is lessened, then the society will be lessened. You are right in that this "perfect world" is not possible with 70 IQ people. Eugenics is necessary for a "perfect world".
DeathSephiroth (May 15, 2008 at 7:02 pm)
If we're talking about EAsians then probably not, no.
khydraa (May 15, 2008 at 5:55 pm)
Of course not, people have the right to their own associations and their choice. And being able to live in the society they choose (to a certain extent) is needed for human happiness. And denying people this right, and justifying the denial with a lie is enough to make me start seeing red.Here's a question: if the world consisted of Europeans and Mongoloid Asians, would you even care about race at all? I probably wouldn't.
DeathSephiroth (May 15, 2008 at 3:48 pm)
"liberal fascism is a term for cultural marxism"Is the unrecognition of racial differences a part of what constitutes liberal fascism?If yes, then... yes, good observation-association!"which has a focus on environment only"Sociologically you mean? Yes it does."I have a focus on genetics, there is no similarity"It was in defense of you, at least so I thought ^^
DeathSephiroth (May 15, 2008 at 3:46 pm)
"thus contradicting the relativism"Indeed I am, one of the things I find interesting with the market-anarchists and infact all ideology's for that matter. The hypocrisy and the narrow views by applying one set of rules upon everybody then claiming moral highground.It's more of a matter of; Is my wish to have a non-white nation immoral? No it's subjective, what harm does it do if it's not forced deportation nor exploitation? Hence morally legitimate. It doesn't infringe on their entity. |
