|
onecleverkid (October 15, 2008 at 7:20 pm)
Hey eVVVVV, has is ever crossed your mind that debating a subject is important? For you to assume that what you are told is automatically the truth (especially when you are getting info from the people who profit from that thinking: drug companies and "HIV specialists") is dangerously stupid. In recent years, so-called "specialists" have been wrong about a great many health issues from ADHD to diabetes to cholesterol. Stop trying to squash the debate. You're making the world worse for everyone.
onecleverkid (October 15, 2008 at 7:16 pm)
How sure can you be that docs are making extra efforts to "account for" something? That makes no sense. The fact remains, people are accused of carrying a deadly virus when they are simply pregnant or sick with some other illness. Take a look at the great cholesterol scam of the last 40 years to see that doctors think they know something for sure and it turns out they were completely wrong. The statin drugs cause heart disease and worrying about trying your cholesterol is nonsensical.
eVVVVV (October 15, 2008 at 6:07 pm)
'onecleverkid'; "If pregnancy is a well known false positive trigger on a so-called HIV test"A fact that I'm sure docs account for when interpreting ALL available evidence for diagnosis."how can you justify treating a pregnant woman as if she's infected with a deadly virus?"Ask a doctor who has to make tough choices with the available tools in an imperfect world in which lurks a deadly virus that is invisible to the naked eye of denialists who will not see.
onecleverkid (October 14, 2008 at 7:51 pm)
If pregnancy is a well known false positive trigger on a so-called HIV test, how can you justify treating a pregnant woman as if she's infected with a deadly virus? How can you justify putting her and her unborn baby on toxic meds? The number 1 cause of death in AIDS patients is liver failure, which is a side-effect of the meds. When will you admit that "healthy" people are being killed by this awful practice? The whole notion of what AIDS is needs to be reconsidered.
eVVVVV (October 4, 2008 at 1:12 am)
(2of2)Yes Baker recounts some of the 'hissy fits' between the opposing groups and reports getting a spam attack from someone of the pro-HIV side. With both sides having high emotions and it can multiply the hostility. Especially since this fight has been going on for a couple of decades. But I expected to find some evidence in "Egg" of HIV being a hoax. It doesn't seem to be anywhere that. Just hot tempers, suspicion and innuendo."Egg" reads like a smoky 'film noir' but so far - no cigar.
eVVVVV (October 4, 2008 at 1:08 am)
(1of2)Clark Baker, private eye, writes; "If you want to understand what I now accept as the most significant criminal conspiracy I have ever imagined, get your coffee and strap on your seatbelt."Yes he recounts some of the 'hissy fits' between the opposing groups and reports getting a spam attack from someone of the pro-HIV side. With both sides having high emotions and it can multiply the hostility. Especially since this has been going on for a couple of decades. (see 2of2)
ZotDudot7 (September 1, 2008 at 10:10 pm)
No, but I got the information I needed. Thanks.
HIVVideos (September 1, 2008 at 1:40 pm)
ZOT did you check out the PDF report to the Semelweiss Society? "Gallos Egg"
ZotDudot7 (August 31, 2008 at 1:32 am)
From the Wikipedia article on Gallo:"In July 2007, Gallo and his team were awarded a $15 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for research into a preventive vaccine for HIV/AIDS."Damn, now THAT'S sick! He (and many others) is making money on his own lies!
ZotDudot7 (August 31, 2008 at 1:29 am)
Indeed, the truth WILL set you free! |
