|
FSAthe1st (August 12, 2008 at 8:39 pm)
"Think of how many other things you're wrong about. Then you argue it against creation? You're far from ready for a serious debate."You like to insult people, don't you Nephi?
nailo1 (August 4, 2008 at 1:29 am)
that does help thank you for your insight
ravnosss (August 3, 2008 at 6:37 pm)
Just to let you know it was FOSSILIZED soft tissue, not SOFT soft tissue.
nailo1 (August 1, 2008 at 12:39 am)
You're not even willing to concede blood vessels and what appear to be cells were found.i never said they did not, the source i qouted from called it collagen and a few others but left out blood cells so i looked harder and later posted where they found the blood vessels in an earlier dig, so right now i will point you agian to the point where i said it can be soft tissue about 3 hours before you posted. ok please let that die i already corrected myself there
nailo1 (August 1, 2008 at 12:32 am)
i said i was sorry and that was the end of it i qouted my source in the video so i see no point in changing it though i will put a note in the box.yes as of yet i can't say anything about why it would have lasted so i will concede the point right now, since it is your challenge. lastly you said in my first video you were not going to debate me, but if you want to debate all of a sudden please address my point in the first video of this series
NephilimFree (July 31, 2008 at 9:22 pm)
Do you see the problem here? Fix it if you want to debate me. I am not going to be a tutor. Debate should be about what the evidence means, not about things that are not evidence for evolution as if they were. Understand?CYA in a year and we'll see if you are ready to debate properly. Misinformation is not something I debate.It can't be millions of years old. Molecular rotation, vibration, and interaction would have turned it into dust after even 1 million years.
NephilimFree (July 31, 2008 at 9:17 pm)
You're not even willing to concede blood vessels and what appear to be cells were found. How can you debate when you claim something observed in science is something it's not for the sake of presenting your angle? Who'd be interested in debating someone willing to do that? Can you get more informed or more honest before you ask me to debate you at some point in the futture?
NephilimFree (July 31, 2008 at 9:17 pm)
I'm not going to debate someone who's making false claims simply because they don't know because they have not studied something and based upon what they BELIVE alone, and not upon what science has demonstrated to us, make claims and use them as evidence against creation or creationist assertions.
NephilimFree (July 31, 2008 at 9:16 pm)
"soft tissue can be muscles..."They found blood vessels and blood cells, as I told you.w w w . smithsonianmag . c o m / science-nature / dinosaur . h t m lThink of how many other things you're wrong about. Then you argue it against creation? You're far from ready for a serious debate.
nailo1 (July 31, 2008 at 5:46 pm)
and to sum up this which you said you would not debate me until now which you are making alot of attacks on me personally instead of just proving me wrong and making me look bad. soft tissue can be muscles, tendons, ligaments, fascia, nerves, fibrous tissues, fat, blood vessels, and synovial membranes. now just saying im wrong about everything else so if i am then tell me or please be quiet |
